As Sandy and I prepared for our Mediterranean cruise and planned our shore excursions at each port of call, we considered matters of personal security and what we would need to help protect ourselves from the expected pickpockets and thieves.  As our trip was to start out in Venice, Italy and end in Barcelona, Spain, between those two points we would visit several European tourist cities.  Rome, Athens, Istanbul and a few others.

Curiously, the worst horror stories we heard involved Barcelona.  It seemed that though we were given cautions on each city we visited, Barcelona was always mentioned as a place rife with pickpockets and thieves.   Truthfully, I began to anticipate our visit to that city with some degree of trepidation.  How would we manage to survive two days of trying to tour the city’s tourist attractions without being robbed of everything but the clothes on our backs?  Perhaps even the clothes on our backs were not safe.

I’ve always been one to practice what is sometimes called “Situational Awareness”, that is, being alert to my surroundings and what and who is in my vicinity.  I’ve never been the victim of a pickpocket nor had anything stolen off of my person and I tend to believe that I practice “safe tourism” but the tales we heard of experiences people have had in Barcelona made me a little uneasy.  If I practice good common sense and don’t do things to make myself an easy victim will she and I be ok?

We spent two very enjoyable days sightseeing around Barcelona and I came to believe that though any place can present safety challenges and there is no such thing as a crime free tourist location, Barcelona has gotten a bad rap and an unfair one at that.  We saw no evidence of any street criminal activity and we certainly had no problems of our own.  Were there any pickpockets around in the places we visited?  I can’t say yes or no but being an observant scanner of surrounding activity, I saw nothing to raise any alarm and certainly there was no known mischief going on anywhere in our vicinity.  We felt perfectly safe.

Now, lest the reader conclude that we simply threw caution to the wind as we walked about the streets, we did not.  I maintained the same level of cautious observation of our surroundings as I always do while in any crowd anywhere.  Owing to the horror stories, perhaps we exercised a bit more caution in observing each other’s person and being more sensitive to who and what is around me and we did feel thankful that we had put some thought into the security question well before our trip began.

One vulnerability any traveler will have is their wallet or purse.  On every shore excursion of this trip we did observe women casually and certainly loosely hand holding the straps of a big purse hanging down their side.  How hard would it be for some kid on a skateboard to fly up beside her, snatch the purse out of her unsuspecting hands and be gone in a flash?  There is such a thing as observing common sense.  Pickpockets are noted for their ability to slip a hand down into any pocket and be gone with your wallet without you ever knowing that it is gone until you later look for it and find it missing.

Additionally we had read of the modern high-tech method of stealing credit card information without the card ever being removed from your pocket.  Scanning devices which can pick up via RF signals and read the data embedded in the credit card strip, and that includes electronic data which may be in passports.  They can do this from as far as a couple of feet away from you and don’t have to make physical contact with your or your credit card.

Apparently pickpockets in many of these tourist cities are quite young, teens and pre-teens, who do their best to blend into the tourist crowds, even to the point of carrying around tourist maps and approaching potential victims with questions regarding directions and other seemingly innocent approaches.  In none of the cities we visited including Barcelona, did we see any of this.  I have no doubt it occurs, but I have the suspicion that (and perhaps I’m wrong in this) the stories are somewhat overblown.  I make that statement not to give any false sense of security or to keep readers from exercising good caution but to ease the fears which can end up spoiling what should be an enjoyable touring experience.

When we researched and read this information we began the search for good hidden wallets which contain RF shielding.  These wallets or “security pouches” are flat allowing them to fit comfortably around the waist and under an overhanging shirt or blouse or even tucked invisibly inside the front of trousers and slacks.  We bought two security wallets. They have two zipper openings to two separate compartments large enough for holding a passport, credit cards, cash and other small items and hold them securely.  I wore mine tucked down inside the front of my trousers.  Sandy wore hers under her overhanging (not tucked in) blouses.  The pouches are secured around the waist with an elastic belt which is adjustable and it too can be tucked down behind the waist band of pants.

 Has Barcelona Gotten a Bad Rap? Has Barcelona Gotten a Bad Rap?  Lewis N. Clark Luggage Rfid Waist Stash, Taupe, One Size Has Barcelona Gotten a Bad Rap?

We found we could wear these all day long including a lot of time on and off of tour buses and much walking around and actually forget that they’re even there.  That’s how well the hide away and the fabric is perfectly comfortable.  I carried nothing more in my pants pocket but a small comb and a handkerchief.  If a pickpocket goes for those, it’s little loss to me.  Not being completely comfortable to wear an expensive watch, I kept mine inside the pouch as well.  The inclusion of the watch was not enough to add noticeable bulk or to change the comfort level.  Sandy kept a tube of lipstick and a small bottle of hand sanitizer inside hers.

Keep your eyes open and glance around and take note of potential trouble situations.  Be very cautious when being approached by strangers asking for directions or being exhibiting suspicious behavior.  Don’t accept offers by strangers to take your picture with your camera.  If wearing a backpack, make sure the pockets are all zipped closed and that if it has a strap across the front which attaches the two shoulder straps, make sure that cross strap is attached.  This will help reduce the chance the pack can be pulled from your back.  We have learned to carry our water bottles inside the backpack rather than in the side outside pockets.  Don’t carry a purse, or anything for that matter, loosely slung over your shoulder and that includes your camera.  In fact, for ladies, try to avoid carrying a purse at all.  The security pouches such as the Lewis N. Clark RFID Waist stash featured above should be the only purse you carry while out in potentially security risk places.  Keep it hidden under a jacket, blouse, or tucked down under the waistband of your pants.

Look around you from time to time and if you notice anyone paying undue attention or appearing to watch you, be cautious.  The old saying of having eyes in the back of your head is more than just meaningless advice.  If you’re with others, take note of them from time to time and be alert to strangers who may be appearing to come too close,.especially from behind.  Basically this means, look out for each other.  It’s a good idea to keep one hand on your camera if it is hanging by a neck strap.  If you’re carrying a bag containing just purchased souvenirs or other items, keep the top closed as much as possible and hold on to it firmly and be aware of your grip on it.

Barcelona is a beautiful city.  We had two days to try to make the most of seeing what we could see there.  The Metro (underground or subway) system is great for getting around to anywhere within the city and from our experience it seems quite safe.  At least on the line we rode.  The Hop On Hop Off sight-seeing bus system is an excellent way of touring the city.  Ride it and stay aboard the whole route if you like, or pick those areas you want to explore more in detail and hop off to have a look around.  When you’re ready to move on, the busses run every few minutes so you can be on your way to the next highlight.  Once you’ve bought your ticket, you’re good for the whole day (multi-day tickets are also available) and you can hop on and hop off on any of the routes and as many times as you like.  I’ll write more on this excellent way to see the city in another post.  The bottom line is, enjoy all that this beautiful and historic city has to offer and don’t let the fear of petty thieves and pickpockets spoil your chance to do so.

Dan Dooley Photography

pin it button Has Barcelona Gotten a Bad Rap?
Posted on by dooleywords | Leave a comment

It’s the small things in life we ought to be thankful for.  I know that is a well worn almost clichéist  statement but I really mean it.  I won’t use this post to list all of the blessings and good things I have to be thankful for, but rather will say this.  I sure am glad to be in the digital photo age rather than the yesteryear of film.

Now don’t get me wrong.  Many of the best works of photography were created on film.  Perhaps it would be better to say “Most of the best works….”  Film photography exudes a particular beauty which really is hard to reproduce through digital image capture.  I am grateful that I did get my photographic start in film as it did give me a perspective on the art which I am not sure that a person just now entering the field of photography and knowing only the digital format can quite grasp.  Rather than wax philosophic, I’ll move on.

Two points of thanksgiving (well it is approaching Autumn now and that grand Thanksgiving Holiday is not far off, so there’s no reason to not get in a little early practice at giving thanks) for the advent of digital photography come to mind.  One, try shooting a roll of film in a 35mm camera now after you have spent the last several years shooting only digital, and not find yourself looking at the back of the camera after each shot, seeing only a blank rear panel and being reminded that you won’t know how the picture turned out until you get it back from the developer.

Speaking of the developer and this is my second point.  I am currently involved in the process of scanning and digitizing a huge quantity of printed images originally shot on 35mm print film.  I did the same thing a couple of years ago with a few thousand (yes, literally) slides I had shot also on 35mm film and even some on 126 format prior to going to print only format.

Though I am reasonably pleased with the general outcome of many of the photographs, scenery composition and generally pleasing appeal, the quality of the actual processing itself is more often than not terrible.  For film image production on a paper surface, there really were mostly two options.  A pro lab to develop and print the images or, and this applies to most of us, take the exposed rolls of film to any of the many “drug store” processing centres and let them do the work.  Just select your print size and paper texture choice.  Pick them up later and give a quick run-through and expect to have the same sense of letdown that they just don’t look as grand as the scene you saw when you looked through the viewfinder.

The first choice, that is, have the processing done by a professional lab would result in much better quality of photo prints but the cost was rather prohibitive unless you are engaged in making money off of your photo prints it’s hard to justify the cost when considering the ten or twelve rolls you may have shot of various vacation scenes some of which may turn out to be prized keepers and others, well, the drugstore processing will be good enough.

You would think that they would at least clean those mechanical print processors.  Or perhaps human handlers with printer ink on their fingers or gloves.  A goodly number of prints I have show signs of dirty handling.  Especially in the upper corners.  I know vignetteing and this is not that.  Almost black corners extending about a quarter inch into the print as though what gripped the paper as it passed through a process of moving through the machines was dirty.  Then the small, not often very small strands of lint, not ON the print but IN the print.  Other defects as well, all the result of hasty, mass process work for which we as the consumers have no control over.  We can either accept the print as it is is, or reject it and not have any physical memory of the scene or event.  Big choice.  Or pay the premium for professional and hopefully more careful handling of our irreplaceable vacation and family affair memories.

There are certainly many more reasons to be grateful for digital photography now but if no more than these, it’s enough.

Dan Dooley Photography.

pin it button How Grateful Are We For Digital Photography?
Posted on by dooleywords | 1 Comment

I had never heard the term either.  That is until I read this article from BetterPhoto Instructor Insights this morning.

Chimping Nonsense and Digital Cameras!

 

 

Dan Dooley Photography

pin it button What Tha Heck is ‘Chimping’?
Posted on by dooleywords | Leave a comment

Shooting Under Water Part 2

Some time back I wrote that we had just ordered a new compact camera for my wife to use and for both of us to use as an underwater or water activity camera when installed in the accompanying waterproof housing.  At the time of the writing of the post, the camera and case had not yet arrived.

Some time has now passed and we have used both the camera, by itself as a dry land walk about camera for my wife, and as a water activity camera.

After much looking and comparing various options we decided on the Canon G12 10 MP Digital Camera with 5x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.8 Inch Vari-Angle LCD Shooting Under Water Part 2
compact. This camera offers features which she has little understanding nor interest what they are but satisfied my requirements. Yes, she is the one using the camera almost exclusively but I want the pictures she shoots to be ones she can be proud of. canon g12 Shooting Under Water Part 2

Next the waterproof housing. Canon offers a housing which is made to fit this camera. The model number Canon WP-DC34 Underwater Housing for Canon PowerShot G11/G12 Digital Camera Shooting Under Water Part 2
waterproofhousing thumb1 Shooting Under Water Part 2

 

The G12 fits perfectly inside the waterproof housing.  I guess if there is an inconvenience to mention it is that the camera strap must be removed prior to inserting the camera in the case.  If the camera is used mostly infrequently with the case, it is not that much of a bother to remove the strap for that use and then return the strap for normal use.

We have used the camera on kayaking excursions both at our local lake and in the Caribbean on St. Maarten and St. Thomas, USVI.  Though we did not submerge the camera and housing on those rides, we did gain a sense of security knowing that should we take a dip, the camera inside the housing would remain safe and dry.

We have also used it under water both on snorkeling outings in the Caribbean and even with the grandkids in our backyard swimming pool.  There have been no signs of leakage at all.  Probably the most basic precaution against leaking is to insure that before the case is closed on the camera that the seal is clean and free of any foreign particles, even something like a hair, which might create a leak condition.

Every camera control is accessible while the camera is in the case due to the well laid out and functioning button controls on the case.  Every operation which can be performed on the camera with the camera controls, including access to the menu functions, is available.  Not worrying about trying to remember the function of individual buttons on the back, as the labeling on the camera buttons is not visible when in the case, the buttons on the back of the case, or at least most of them are accompanied by the small icon symbols like those on the camera itself.  Obviously it’s easier to use the controls directly on the camera than when in the case simply because less frequent use will hinder instant familiarity.  You will have to look for and at the buttons.  While underwater wearing a mask or goggles it will be harder but with a little practice remembering which buttons and controls do what, it will become much easier.  Besides, a lot of action under water is going to be mostly point and shoot.

On any digital camera relying on a camera back display screen, in bright sun, the viewed image is going to be a little harder to see.  Add the extra layer of heavy plastic, though quite clear, between your eyes, the swim mask lens, and finally the camera display, and the view of the image on the screen is going to be somewhat harder to see.  For most underwater shooting conditions though, it is quite good enough.  The camera does have a brightness control for the display and that can help.  You can still see it quite well enough to make good composition of your pictures.  Please do not consider the statements in this paragraph grounds for rejection of the camera case.  It will apply to ANY underwater camera setup.

I will be posting a more detailed evaluation of the G12 camera itself in a future post.  I will not make it a long technical review, but rather some basic thoughts and observations of the camera.  Don’t worry, my assessment of it is quite good and though there are later models comparable which a new camera buyer may want to consider, for someone looking for a very good camera and waterproof housing combination, this is a good way to go.  We’re certainly happy with the choice.

Dan Dooley Photography

 Shooting Under Water Part 2 Shooting Under Water Part 2 Canon WP-DC34 Underwater Housing for Canon PowerShot G11/G12 Digital Camera Shooting Under Water Part 2

pin it button Shooting Under Water Part 2
Posted in Camera Equipment, Technical Information, Under Water Photography | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A Web Site is a Better Platform for Photo Albums – Part Two

I have hundreds of photographs stored on my computer system.  These are photos from vacation trips and quite a few photographic outings over the last several years.  Not only images shot in digital but a good number of photos which originated as film prints and slides and which have been scanned and digitized.  The collection of photos from a wide variety of occasions and subjects is rather like a large old fashioned steamer trunk which one might pack away family memorabilia and hide away in the attic.  You know you have them but no one ever gets to see or appreciate them.  All of the photographs stashed on my computer hard drive are of little value other than that I know I shot them and that I have them.

I have posted quite a few individual photos and some collections of photos in albums on a Facebook.  In addition to posting on the Wall of my personal account, I have a photography specific Facebook page on which a fairly large sum of photos have been posted.  Likewise , I have posted a number of subject specific photos on my Flickr page.  Additionally, I have photos listed on a couple of other on line locations including this Dooley Words blog.

Those locations serve a purpose and meet certain audiences.  Still, I have many photos which I would like to share but the mentioned available locations all have certain limitations which keep them from being quite what I need for the purpose of sharing and making visible the quantity of photos I have.  Of course not every photo I have on the computer is one I’d like to make visible or share.  Many are just kept because I either have not yet gotten to them to judge whether or not they are worth keeping, or for one reason or other, I just can’t bring myself to delete them.  That may come later.  For now, they just sit in folders and take up hard drive space.

I have an advantage in options that I have my own web site domain.  As I already have three web sites on line, one of them being photographic specific, it was a natural choice to use that site as an on line photo gallery.  The advantage of using a more traditional web site structure for photo gallery display is that a web site, as opposed to a blog, Facebook, or any of the other common on line photo display options is that the structure of a web site can be made more horizontal in structure.  Rather than newer listings, or newly added photos or albums, pushing previous ones down and eventually off the page into the archives steamer trunk, new additions can sit alongside older ones. Menu driven navigation across the web site takes visitors directly to named albums and other resources and what is posted on a page, unless it has been intentionally changed, even if new additions come along, will remain right where you put it on the pages of a web site.

I am in the process of adding an extensive gallery of photo albums to Dan Dooley Photography.  Slowly but surely, albums covering a number of different photo subjects and vacation trips will be added.  As of this posting, I have three albums on line.  Each one chronicles a different ocean cruise my wife and I have experienced in recent years.  The most recent one was in the Eastern Caribbean the first part of April 2012.

day 2 4363d blog A Web Site is a Better Platform for Photo Albums   Part Two

Click on the picture to see the album in its entirety.   That is unless you have a specific reason for wanting to avoid the temptation to book a cruise straightaway.  If that is a problem for you, I cannot help you.  Sorry.  wlEmoticon angrysmile A Web Site is a Better Platform for Photo Albums   Part Two

To access the gallery of albums (as incomplete as it is) Go Here

pin it button A Web Site is a Better Platform for Photo Albums   Part Two
Posted in General Photography, Travel Photography | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A Web Site is a Better Platform for Photo Albums–Part One

One of the challenges to the enjoyment of making photographs is how to share them with others.  I remember my mom printing descriptive text on the back of some of the black and white photos she made of my sisters and I, and mailing the prints in letters to family members with the strict instruction to send them back to her when they had finished viewing the photos.

I also remember the several years I shot only slides and the task of setting up the slide projector and screen to view the lengthy slide collections from various family holiday trips or other events or occasions.   We all know the old jokes regarding the pain inflicted on company by having to sit through hour long vacation picture slide shows.

Later, finally giving in to the understanding that sharing images by slide projector was not the best method, I switched to shooting only photo prints.  That was a little more convenient since at least I could simply open up a small book form photo album to show the pictures of the latest family holiday trip.

There remained the problem of how to share those images with friends and family members who are not close by.  Mail prints like my mom did?  Not a particular appealing option, especially since these days, few people actually write and mail letter correspondence to each other.

Now we are in the digital age.  Photos are hardly ever on print paper these days and few people still shoot slide film.  Ok, other than, perhaps those professionals who use transparency film for printed media reproduction.  Digital images can be sent instantly via the Internet to one or as many people as we wish.  Nearby or around the world.

Often we want to share on a larger scale.  Not only do we want specific individuals, to whom we can email copies of the digital images, but perhaps we want to share individual photos or even entire collections of photos with a wider audience.

Social Media sites such as Facebook, Flickr and others provide good platforms for sharing single or multiple images and even entire albums of images.  Free places to store and share your vacation memories on line and viewable by literally the whole world, if you want the whole world to view them?  Beats writing on the back of a black and white Brownie box camera print and stuffing it into an envelope along with the admonition to return this picture when you’ve finished looking at it.

One of the drawbacks to using the popular photo display and social media sites such as Facebook for displaying photos or collections of photos is that these sites store content in a vertical structure.  In other words, what is posted today is pushed down lower in the stack by what is posted tomorrow.  And the more time that passes with additional posts added, the further down the stack your photo album goes.  What appears on your Facebook news feed today for all of your friends to see, by next year will be hard to find, without scrolling down through a long list of more recently posted pictures.  Perhaps the dynamic aspect of these media though great for their intended purpose, makes them less than the perfect photo and photo album display platform.  We need something a little more static.  That is, something which will present access to your photos today, tomorrow, one year, five years from now just as it was at the time you put them on line.  In the follow up post I will discuss why I believe a conventional web site with a page structure is a better platform.

Dan Dooley Photography

pin it button A Web Site is a Better Platform for Photo Albums–Part One
Posted in General Photography | Leave a comment

Heavy Cameras Putting a Strain on Straps?

Recently a friend added a Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM lens to his photo equipment kit.  Using the lens on the camera body revealed to him, as it does quickly to all of us, that it is heavy and added to the weight of the camera body, you’re putting at least five or six pounds of expensive  hardware hanging from your neck.

His question to me was, should there be a reason to worry about the neck strap eyelets on the camera body breaking loose with all that weight?  Good question.  Honestly I had not really thought about that being a potential problem before but it’s a valid concern.  The thought of  having about $3000 worth of camera and lens hit the ground hard because a camera strap eyelet broke, is the stuff of nightmares.

I have never had an eyelet break loose from a camera body and I have not heard reports of that happening either.  It is certainly possible and I’ll bet that it probably has happened, but I suspect that the greater risk involves the strap itself.  I can’t speak for all camera makers but being a Canon user and from what I have seen of Nikon, at least for those two names, the quality of the materials and construction of the neck straps on their cameras is quite good and they are reliable.  For after market straps, I think every user should be careful to consider quality when making camera strap purchases.

That does not mean that age and wear cannot compromise the safety of the straps.  The material can wear with time and use and there is always the chance that a “buckle” can break.  Those are, after all, plastic and though the plastic looks to be very sturdy, abuse and constant wear with time may weaken the material.

I looked at the strap on my Canon 40D this morning.  Though there is the expected edge wear around the eyelets, the integrity of the strap still looks secure.  It is something I’m going to keep an eye on though and should the material show signs of wearing thin, it will be time to replace the strap.

strap 1112 Heavy Cameras Putting a Strain on Straps?
The green arrow points to the eyelet on the left side of the camera body.  The eyelet is metal and looks to be steel.  It looks to be mounted securely to the main frame of the camera body so is probably not at risk of easily coming apart.

strap 1123 thumb Heavy Cameras Putting a Strain on Straps?
The green arrow points to the eyelet on the right side of the camera body.  Like the one on the left, it is of metal and looks to be securely fastened to the frame.  The red arrow points to the edge of the strap where it passes through the eyelet and does show a little edge wear.  That’s expected of a camera with high usage.

I know, there is a lot of lint and dust particles on the camera.  Hey, it is a work tool and not a shelf display object. wlEmoticon smile Heavy Cameras Putting a Strain on Straps?

strap 1127 thumb Heavy Cameras Putting a Strain on Straps?

The thickness of the buckle cross piece looks sufficient to avoid easy breakage.  That is one item I would advise keeping an eye on.  I have seen the cross piece of buckles on other strapped items break.  There is a lot of pressure here, I think so it’s important that the material be strong and uncompromised.

Dan Dooley Photography

pin it button Heavy Cameras Putting a Strain on Straps?
Posted in Camera Equipment | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Careful, that lens is breakable

I did it.  Not something I ever wanted to do but it can happen to all of us.  Just when we think that we’re responsible and careful, look out.  Accidents happen.  I know, it’s carelessness and it certainly was in this case.

My Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 wide angle lens was mounted on the Canon 40D dSLR camera and sitting on top of a computer bag in the back seat of the car on a recent trip – yes, our trip to Florida’s Disney world – at a rest stop for lunch, the back door is opened and out fell the camera with lens onto the parking lot pavement.

The one piece lens instantly became two pieces.  The following pictures show the extent of the damage.  Thankfully, that was not the only lens I had with me.  Good lesson, right?  Don’t ever assume that you will use only one lens on a trip.  Not that I would ever limit myself to only one lens anyhow.

The good news, and yes, we always have to look at the bright side, is that the camera was not damaged.  Not even noticeable scratches added.  The other piece of good news is that the lens is repairable.  No damage to the glass nor to the outer barrel.  It is now awaiting repair and return from Tokina Service.

tokina 1 64381 1024x723 Careful, that lens is breakable

tokina 2 64401 1024x707 Careful, that lens is breakable

 

pin it button Careful, that lens is breakable
Posted in Camera Equipment, Travel Photography | Tagged , , | Leave a comment